SimilarSiteSearch SimilarSiteSearch

Top 10 Academic Search Engines Like Google Scholar

By Gregor K. published about 2023-01-24 23:38:34

Are you looking for websites similar to Google Scholar for your research? Look no further, as we have compiled a list of the top websites like Google Scholar that can help you find the best sources for your research. From academic databases to specialized search tools, this list has something to offer for everyone. Read on to learn more about the most popular websites like Google Scholar.

Google Scholar

648

Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

Features

  • Search for academic articles from a wide range of disciplines
  • Get access to millions of scholarly articles from books, journals, and websites
  • Keep track of your research with My Library
  • Automatically generate bibliographies with Citation Manager

Google Scholar Alternatives

Microsoft Academic

Microsoft Academic is a research and collaboration platform for academia and research professionals. The platform provides access to millions of academic articles, journal publications, and other scholarly works, and allows users to search, read, and collaborate with researchers, faculty members, and other professionals across the world.

Both services offer comprehensive search for scholarly literature, including articles, theses, books, abstracts, and court opinions.

Microsoft Academic provides detailed citation analysis on authors, articles, and journals, whereas Google Scholar does not.

Is Microsoft Academic a good alternative?
|

Scopus

Scopus is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature, featuring smart tools to track, analyze and visualize research. It contains over 21,000 titles from more than 5,000 publishers in over 80 countries.

Both services offer comprehensive search for scholarly literature, including articles, theses, books, abstracts, and court opinions.

Scopus offers a more advanced search compared to Google Scholar, allowing for the use of more complex search terms.

Is Scopus a good alternative?
|

CiteSeerX

CiteSeerX is an academic search engine and digital library for scientific and academic literature. It is a collection of over 10 million documents from various disciplines, including computer science, mathematics, engineering, biology, and medicine. It also provides access to research papers, theses, and dissertations.

Both services provide access to scholarly literature, including articles, theses, books, and abstracts.

CiteSeerX offers more specialized searches, such as searching by author, title, subject, or language, which is not available on Google Scholar.

Is CiteSeerX a good alternative?
|

JSTOR

JSTOR is an online digital library of more than 12 million academic journal articles, books, and primary sources in 75 disciplines. It helps people discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content through a powerful research and teaching platform.

Both services provide access to scholarly literature, including articles, theses, books, and abstracts.

JSTOR offers more specialized searches, such as searching by date, place, genre, or language, which is not available on Google Scholar.

Is JSTOR a good alternative?
|

Web of Science

Web of Science is a powerful research platform that connects scientific knowledge across disciplines and regions. It provides the research and analytics capabilities needed to support the advancement of science, with access to the world’s leading scholarly literature, data and analytics.

Both services offer comprehensive search for scholarly literature, including articles, theses, books, abstracts, and court opinions.

Web of Science offers more advanced searching capabilities, including the ability to search by author, publication, and subject.

Is Web of Science a good alternative?
|

ScienceDirect

ScienceDirect is a leading full-text scientific database offering journal articles and book chapters from more than 2,500 peer-reviewed journals and more than 11,000 books. It features content from the world’s leading academic publishers, including Elsevier, Academic Press, and Elsevier Science.

Both services offer comprehensive search for scholarly literature, including articles, theses, books, abstracts, and court opinions.

ScienceDirect offers more specialized searches, such as searching by journal, publisher, or specific topic, which is not available on Google Scholar.

Is ScienceDirect a good alternative?
|

PubMed

PubMed is a free search engine providing access to over 25 million citations from biomedical literature, including MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. It is maintained by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) at the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), located at the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Both services provide access to primary research literature, including articles, theses, books, and abstracts.

PubMed offers more specialized searches, such as searching by author, journal, or date, which is not available on Google Scholar.

Is PubMed a good alternative?
|

Google

Google is a search engine that indexes webpages, images, videos, and other content on the internet. It enables users to quickly and easily find information on the web.

Both websites are owned and operated by Google.

Google Scholar focuses on academic research while Google is a search engine for general web content.

Is Google a good alternative?
|

EBSCO

EBSCO provides high-quality content from more than 450,000 full-text and abstracted periodicals, books, monographs, reports and more. With a comprehensive range of library services, EBSCO offers libraries, schools, universities and other organizations access to the content and services they need to support their research and learning activities.

Both Google Scholar and EBSCO are search engines for scholarly literature.

Google Scholar is free to use, while EBSCO requires a subscription for access.

Is EBSCO a good alternative?
|

ResearchGate

ResearchGate is an academic networking platform that connects researchers in over 200 countries and disciplines. It enables researchers to share their research, collaborate with colleagues, get answers to questions, and explore new opportunities.

Both Google Scholar and ResearchGate are online research platforms.

Google Scholar is a search engine that provides access to scholarly literature, whereas ResearchGate is an academic social network that allows users to share research and collaborate with peers.

Is ResearchGate a good alternative?
|

Wikipedia

Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia, created and edited by volunteers around the world and hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation. It features more than 39 million articles in 280 languages, and is one of the most comprehensive sources of information on the Internet.

Both websites provide access to information on a variety of topics.

Google Scholar provides access to scholarly research, while Wikipedia is an open-source encyclopedia with information from many sources.

Is Wikipedia a good alternative?
|

Google Scholar Head-To-Head

Welcome to this head-to-head comparison of Google Scholar and other websites. We will be taking a closer look at the features, usability, and overall value of this popular search engine, in order to determine whether it stands out from the competition. As an academic research tool, Google Scholar provides access to scientific literature from across the world. But how does it really compare when pitted against other websites? Stay tuned as we take a deep dive into the pros and cons of each platform!

Google Scholar
vs.
Google

Google Scholar is a specialized search engine that indexes scholarly literature, including articles, books, theses, conference proceedings, and other material. It has advanced search capabilities that allow users to search by author name or publication title. Google Scholar also provides metrics such as citation counts and h-index values for authors and publications. Additionally, it includes options to filter results by date and relevance. Google is a general purpose search engine that searches websites and images. It offers advanced search features such as image filters, time filters, and location-based results. Additionally, users can refine their results by file type or topic. Google also features an autocomplete function which makes it easier to quickly find relevant information on the web. However unlike Google Scholar, it does not provide metrics such as citation counts or h-index values for authors and publications.

Google Scholar
vs.
EBSCO

Google Scholar and EBSCO are both academic search engines designed to help users locate information on a variety of topics. Google Scholar offers access to scholarly literature, including peer-reviewed papers, theses, books, preprints, abstracts and technical reports. It also provides links to related articles and other resources. EBSCO is a comprehensive resource for students and researchers with access to thousands of full-text journals and magazines in all disciplines. It also provides access to library catalogs, databases, encyclopedias and other reference sources. Both search engines offer advanced search capabilities that allow users to narrow their searches by subject, author or keyword phrases. Google Scholar also offers citation tracking tools which allows users to track how often an article or book has been cited. Additionally, Google Scholar includes a “Cited By” feature which displays other works that have cited the material being viewed. EBSCO does not provide these features but does offer alerts which allow users to receive email notifications when new articles matching their search criteria become available.

Google Scholar
vs.
Google

Google Scholar and Google Search are both websites powered by the same search engine, Google. While they both provide users with search capabilities, their results vary significantly. Google Scholar is a specific search tool for scholarly literature such as articles, theses, books, abstracts and court opinions. It provides access to peer-reviewed papers, theses and books from academic publishers, universities and other scholarly organizations. Results on Google Scholar also include relevant webpages in addition to traditional sources of academic information. Google Search is a general search engine that returns results from websites all around the world based on keywords entered by the user. Results may include webpages, images and videos related to the query. Google Scholar is designed specifically for research purposes while Google Search can be used to find anything from recipes to news stories to product reviews. Both tools are useful for finding information quickly but depending on what type of information is being sought one of these tools may be more appropriate than the other.

Google Scholar
vs.
JSTOR

Google Scholar and JSTOR are two online sources for academics and researchers. Google Scholar is a search engine with a wide range of scholarly literature, including articles, books, theses, court opinions and more. It allows users to search across multiple disciplines, such as science, medicine, law and economics. JSTOR is an online library with books, journals and primary sources on topics in the humanities and social sciences. It offers more than 12 million full-text items from over 1,400 publishers. Both websites offer powerful search capabilities and offer different methods of accessing content. For example, Google Scholar enables keyword searching across multiple fields while JSTOR allows users to browse collections by subject or title. Additionally, each source provides unique features that aid in research; Google Scholar includes citation tracking while JSTOR offers sorting capabilities by date or relevance.

Google Scholar
vs.
Web of Science

Google Scholar and Web of Science are both bibliographic databases that enable users to search for and access scholarly journal articles. Google Scholar provides access to academic articles from a range of sources such as preprints, publisher websites, repositories, and journals. It allows for comprehensive searching across disciplines including medicine, engineering, humanities, science and more. Web of Science is a proprietary product provided by Clarivate Analytics that indexes only content from peer-reviewed journals. This makes it easier to find reliable references in the research process. Both websites allow users to narrow searches by author, title or subject and also include other features such as citation tools, metrics for measuring impact factors and recommendations for related documents. The main difference between the two sites is the availability of content which varies based on the products offered by each website.

Google Scholar
vs.
PubMed

Google Scholar and PubMed are two popular websites for finding scholarly literature. Both websites provide access to a vast selection of scientific papers, journal articles, books, and other documents from academic publishers and professional societies. Google Scholar offers a more user-friendly search engine that allows users to quickly find relevant results based on keywords or phrases. It also provides links to related authors, articles, and citations. Additionally, Google Scholar features an intuitive interface with easy-to-use filtering tools that can help users narrow down their search results. In contrast, PubMed provides a more comprehensive collection of medical literature than Google Scholar. It has been developed specifically for searching medical databases such as MEDLINE and includes more specific information about each article, such as abstracts and full text access if available. PubMed also offers powerful tools for searching by author name or MeSH terms (Medical Subject Headings).

Google Scholar
vs.
ResearchGate

Google Scholar and ResearchGate are two websites that offer different services for researchers. Google Scholar is a search engine tailored to academic literature, allowing users to easily discover scholarly content such as journal articles, conference papers, books, and dissertations. It also provides citation metrics to help assess impact of publications and create bibliographies. ResearchGate is a social network for scientists and researchers that provides a platform for sharing research materials, creating collaborations, finding experts in certain fields, and asking questions. It also offers tools to analyze the impact of one’s research by providing indicators such as the number of times an article has been read or cited. Both platforms have features that allow users to track citations and analyze the impact of their work but differ in terms of focus: Google Scholar excels at discovering content while ResearchGate focuses on networking with other academics.

Google Scholar
vs.
Scopus

Google Scholar and Scopus are both academic search engines that allow users to search for scholarly literature. Google Scholar offers free access to millions of publications, while Scopus is a subscription-based resource. Google Scholar covers more disciplines than Scopus, as it includes books, conference papers, and technical reports in its index. It also includes citations from databases such as PubMed, Medline, and the Web of Science. Additionally, Google Scholar has a detailed citation tool that allows authors to see how many times their work has been cited by other researchers. On the other hand, Scopus offers an expansive database of peer-reviewed journals across all disciplines, with in-depth information on each paper including author profiles and citation metrics. Its advanced search capabilities enable users to quickly locate relevant articles based on specific criteria (e.g., author name or subject matter). Furthermore, Scopus also offers an alerting feature which enables users to set up customized alerts for new content related to their research interests. In summary, both platforms offer powerful search tools that allow users to quickly locate relevant scholarship on any topic; however, Google Scholar is free while Scopus requires a subscription for full access.

Google Scholar
vs.
Wikipedia

Google Scholar and Wikipedia are two of the most popular websites for researching information. Although both websites provide a wealth of information, they differ in terms of content and features. Google Scholar is a search engine for scholarly literature, such as journal articles, books, online documents, reports, etc., while Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia with articles on almost any topic imaginable. Google Scholar allows you to search for specific topics and authors in order to find relevant results quickly. The website also provides citation tools that help you cite sources accurately. Additionally, advanced search options allow you to narrow down your results by language and publication year. Wikipedia’s main advantage over Google Scholar is its broad range of topics covered. The website has millions of articles written on almost any subject imaginable, making it easy to quickly get an overview of a certain topic or person. Furthermore, users can easily contribute to the website by editing existing pages or creating new ones which adds more depth and breadth to the content provided. Overall, both websites provide valuable sources of information but they each have their own unique features that make them better suited for different purposes. Whether searching for scholarly literature or general knowledge, Google Scholar and Wikipedia are excellent resources when researching information.


History of Google Scholar

Google Scholar is a website launched in 2004 that provides a search engine for academic literature and scholarly sources. It provides a searchable index of scholarly literature across a wide variety of fields and sources, including peer-reviewed papers, theses, books, preprints, abstracts and technical reports from various publishers. Google Scholar allows users to search for digital or physical copies of approved sources and provides citation information for documents they find. It is currently used by millions of students and researchers worldwide.


Google Scholar Status

The Google Scholar website on online and reachable (last checked on 2024-04-25 01:00:24).

Online
Last checked 2024-04-25 01:00:24.
Uptime overview of the past three days.
Do you have problems accessing Google Scholar's website? .

Comments

  • Looks like Google Scholar has a lot of twin websites!

    2023-05-26 02:44:02 ·
  • Looks like the other websites are trying to one-up Google Scholar!

    2023-07-18 07:55:14 ·
  • Who knew there were so many clones of Google Scholar?

    2023-07-27 08:22:57 ·
  • Looks like Google Scholar's got some competition!

    2023-10-06 12:34:13 ·
  • So much for being unique!

    2023-10-09 10:33:57 ·
  • M C

    Wow - who knew there were so many copycat websites out there?!

    2024-03-14 02:39:27 ·
  • Guess Google Scholar isn't so special after all!

    2024-03-21 18:24:15 ·