7 Alternative Research Sites Like ProQuest for Finding Scholarly Materials

ProQuest

vs.

EBSCO

89

ProQuest and EBSCO are two powerful research databases that allow users to delve into the depths of scholarly research. ProQuest has a vast array of full-text journals, books, dissertations, newspaper articles, and other resources while EBSCO has a wealth of peer-reviewed academic sources. Both platforms offer reliable search tools with advanced search options and personalized user accounts for saving searches and organizing results. ProQuest is commonly used for finding historical documents and specialized subject areas like education and psychology whereas EBSCO is ideal for exploring current science topics across multiple disciplines. Furthermore, both platforms provide free access to abstracts and citation information on millions of items as well as options for downloading content in various formats. In conclusion, ProQuest and EBSCO are both excellent sources for comprehensive research projects.

ProQuest

vs.

Grammarly

18

ProQuest and Grammarly are two websites that provide different services. ProQuest is an online library of databases, journals and books that assist with research. It provides access to millions of documents and other media sources, as well as powerful search capabilities. Grammarly is an AI-powered writing assistant designed to help users improve their writing with personalized suggestions based on the context of the text. It offers real-time feedback on grammar and spelling, plagiarism detection, and a wide range of writing style checks. ProQuest can be used for researching scholarly papers, while Grammarly can be used for improving the quality of written documents such as essays or reports. Both websites offer powerful tools for aiding in their respective tasks; however, they serve very different purposes.

ProQuest

vs.

Google Scholar

67

ProQuest and Google Scholar are both popular search engines for scholarly literature. ProQuest provides access to a vast selection of full-text articles, dissertations, theses, eBooks, newspapers, magazines and other types of content from academic publishers, professional societies, online repositories and universities. Content is organized into various databases such as ProQuest Central and ABI/Inform Global. It also offers advanced search capabilities including field-specific searching, limiting by date range or language and citation tracking. Google Scholar is a free search engine that indexes the full text of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines. Users can search for specific authors or articles using keywords or phrases. The results page includes links to relevant material as well as bibliographic information such as abstracts, citations and references. Unlike ProQuest, Google Scholar does not provide access to full-text content but instead provides links to external sources where available. It also lacks features such as field-specific searching or citation tracking.

ProQuest

vs.

JSTOR

11

ProQuest and JSTOR are both digital libraries that offer access to scholarly content, including books, journals, dissertations, primary sources, images, videos and more. Both websites allow users to search within their databases for specific articles or topics. ProQuest offers a variety of features for users such as the ability to save search criteria to be used later, an advanced search option for those with specialized knowledge of a particular topic and the ability to access ProQuest's full-text archives from different countries. Additionally, ProQuest provides users with access to its mobile app which allows them to take their research on-the-go. JSTOR offers features like allowing users to browse disciplines from one page and search by faceted filters such as date range or language in order to narrow down results. It also provides access to articles from over 2,300 journals in more than 60 disciplines and includes collections of digital primary sources such as photographs, letters and court records. In addition JSTOR allows users to create personal collections of items they have saved during research which can then be shared with colleagues or other researchers. Both ProQuest and JSTOR provide powerful tools for conducting research online but each have different sets of features that may appeal more towards certain types of researchers.

ProQuest

vs.

PubMed

41

ProQuest and PubMed are both searchable databases of scholarly literature. ProQuest focuses on providing access to over 10,000 journals, magazines, newspapers and other sources with a large selection of topics for research. It also offers access to a variety of specialized content collections such as dissertations and theses, primary source material, ebooks and multimedia resources. ProQuest also features features such as advanced search capabilities and subject-specific browsing options. PubMed is a free resource from the US National Library of Medicine that provides access to millions of citations from medical journals and online books. Unlike ProQuest, it is focused primarily on biomedical and health sciences research. PubMed includes additional features such as full-text searching capability, MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) indexing for greater specificity in searching, and links to external full text articles when available. Both databases offer access to bibliographic information including abstracts, authors, journal names and publication year.

ProQuest

vs.

Scopus

50

ProQuest and Scopus are both online databases that provide access to a wide range of academic content. ProQuest has an extensive collection of books, dissertations, newspapers, magazines, and other sources with more than 160 million full-text articles from thousands of sources. On the other hand, Scopus is a leading abstract and citation database with over 20,000 titles from 5,000+ international publishers. The major difference between the two databases is that ProQuest offers comprehensive coverage while Scopus provides only scholarly literature indexed by its own algorithms. ProQuest also features advanced search capabilities such as faceted searching which allows users to refine search results by specific categories or fields. Meanwhile, Scopus offers an intuitive user interface and an in-depth features such as its Citation Tracker tool which enables researchers to quickly view how often their work is cited. Both websites also offer additional features such as RSS feeds and alerts to keep users up-to-date on their research topics.