6 Alternatives to Archive.is for Archiving Webpages

Archive.is

vs.

Ancestry

26

Archive.is and Ancestry are both websites that provide services for preserving, searching and exploring historical data. Archive.is is a web archiving service that captures a snapshot of the current version of a website and stores it in an archive, allowing users to look back at how the site appeared at that time. It can be used to preserve any web page, regardless of its content. Ancestry is a genealogical research website which provides access to millions of historical documents and other resources for researching family history. Archive.is allows users to capture snapshots of websites or pages as they appear at any given point in time, while Ancestry focuses on providing access to records such as birth, marriage and death certificates, census records, military service records, newspaper articles and obituaries. Both sites have their own search functions but Ancestry has additional advanced search capabilities such as searching by name or keyword. Archive.is also allows users to view archived pages offline by downloading them as PDFs while Ancestry provides curated collections of records from various countries around the world.

Archive.is

vs.

Cache

65

Archive.is and Cache are both web archiving tools designed to provide a service that allows users to save, store, and retrieve webpages from the internet. Both services allow users to capture the content of any webpage at a given moment in time, including all images and links, so that it can be retrieved later even if the webpage or website has been changed or removed. Archive.is offers an easy-to-use online interface that enables users to submit URLs for archiving or download archived pages as HTML files. The Archive.is service is free and also provides a basic search engine so users can quickly locate archived copies of websites they have previously saved. Additionally, Archive.is provides an API which makes it easy for developers to integrate the service into their own applications and websites. Cache provides more features than Archive.is but requires a paid subscription in order to use it. In addition to capturing and storing webpages for future retrieval, Cache also allows users to customize their archiving settings by specifying when pages should be automatically updated, how often they should be checked for changes, and what types of changes should be tracked (such as new links). Cache also offers advanced search capabilities which allow users to find specific versions of a page based on its content or date/time of capture.

Archive.is

vs.

Cloud

51

Archive.is and Cloud are both cloud storage solutions that provide users with the ability to securely store, share and access their digital data. Archive.is offers a range of features designed to help users maintain records and documents such as document versioning, full-text search, and an easy-to-use interface. Cloud provides additional features that support collaboration such as real-time editing, advanced document sharing capabilities, and private folders. Both services also include security features such as encryption, two-factor authentication, and access control lists. However, Archive.is is focused more on providing a robust archive system for storing documents while Cloud is more suited for collaboration and teamwork.

Archive.is

vs.

Zip

15

Archive.is and Zip are both online services that allow users to store and manage files. Archive.is is a web archiving service that stores snapshots of webpages, while Zip is a cloud storage provider that can be used to store any type of file. Both services provide easy access to user files from any device with an internet connection, but Archive.is offers more features than Zip in terms of archiving webpages. Archive.is captures more detailed information about the page, such as its text content, images, metadata, and even the code used to create it. This makes it an ideal choice for archiving webpages and preserving them over time. On the other hand, Zip is better suited for users who need a reliable way to store files on the cloud without needing to worry about their preservation over time.

Archive.is

vs.

Old

10

Archive.is and Old are both web archiving services which provide users with the ability to save snapshots of websites at a particular point in time. Archive.is offers more features than Old, including the ability to save both webpages and PDFs, as well as an API which allows developers to access the archived content programmatically. In addition, Archive.is has an advanced search feature which allows users to search for specific content within archived pages, while Old does not offer this feature. Archive.is also provides users with a ‘Memento’ feature which allows them to view previous versions of a webpage over a certain period of time, whereas Old does not have this functionality. Finally, Archive.is boasts a more comprehensive collection of archived pages than Old, making it ideal for those looking for more comprehensive archiving capabilities.

Archive.is

vs.

Wayback Machine

6

Archive.is and Wayback Machine are two online services that offer web archiving services for individuals and organizations. Both websites allow users to capture, store, and access web pages for historical purposes. Archive.is focuses on capturing web pages at specific points in time and preserving them as they were originally seen on the Internet. It provides a permanent archive of the page, including all HTML elements, images, videos, etc., with no ads or tracking scripts. In addition to archiving individual webpages, Archive.is also allows users to create collections of archived pages, which can be shared with others or kept private. Wayback Machine is an extensive digital library of webpages that have been archived over time. The service offers a searchable interface that allows users to quickly find archived versions of websites from different points in time. Wayback Machine does not preserve the original layout and content of a webpage; instead it captures a snapshot of what the webpage looked like at the time it was archived. Unlike Archive.is, Wayback Machine does contain ads and tracking scripts in its archives due to its focus on creating an interactive library experience rather than providing full preservation of original content as seen on the internet at particular points in time.